Jump to content

Alex A Casey

Member
  • Posts

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Alex A Casey's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Thanks! I recall using pack folder function!
  2. Thanks a lot! I recall using Pack Folder function!
  3. Hi! I used folder tracks in LP 9 in multi display mode with two monitors and I could navigate separately on two screens. For instance I opened one folder on 1st monitor and could open another folder on the other one. When i open LP9 projects in LPX this works but I can't imagine how to get the same functionality in a new LPX project Any suggestions? Thanks in advance
  4. Thanks a lot! It was saved as a project folder. I can't find backups folder there.
  5. Hi! when I used LP9 I could find the project file backups folder if I needed. How to find that in LPX? I've blown my mind but have not succeeded. Where is it now? Many thanks
  6. Hey, Have you tried searching for help at YouTube? There are lots of helpful videos about it.
  7. I don't think Apple will fix it even if they know this bug. They are interested in LPX sales much more than is supporting legacy software. F!!
  8. I've got almost the same issue when I use two arrange windows on two LCD monitors. Any plugin can make LP9 irresponsible at any time. It needs too much time to make LP active.. I usually use F3 button on wireless keyboard then select any window. It helps but bothers too much.
  9. Really like it! I've sent you a private message.
  10. I found the solution. 1. Go from 64-bi to 32-bit version 2. Disable all plugins in AU manager. 3. Go back to 64-bit version
  11. Hello! I used TC Electronic Powercore Express card with Logic. Some projects contain POCO plugins. Unfortunately, I can't use that card due to last OSX update (PoCo is not supported officially). The worst thing is that Logic simply crashes every time when I'm trying to open any project with POCO plugins used there. How to run that projects without that plugins? I need your help because I can't work with very important projects.
  12. It looks like Don't fall in love with a dreamer by Kenny Rogers. The harmony is almost the same. Nonetheless, I'd add a fat bass line to give the song a fundamental bottom and a couple of secondary parts of strings.
  13. Why be sorry to me? I was not involved in the makings of LPX!! It's not about advertising. It's about a community of music producers discussing their tools and how they use them. You are more than welcome to freely state your opinions on this website, even if that opinion is that a tool other than Logic is better adapted to certain music production tasks. So: which other DAW are you thinking about? My guess is, PT 11? Thanks, Dave. Some forum owners stay against any mentions of another software. You were almost right. I meant Pro Tools 10 HD. I used trial version very hardly and found that has many advantages vs LP9 for mixing and editing. I switched to PT10 HD for final mixing and slight editing. Nonetheless, LP is much and much more creative tool,especially in working with software synths. It gives a thousand steps ahead for PT. For instance, Virus Control centre works awful in RTAS mode. Some synths sound poor in RTAS mode by comparison with AU mode. I compared playing the same audio files via two AVID 192 I/O in both LP9 and PT10HD and may say that PT is better. So, now my work flow is as following: composing and programming software instruments in LP9. Midi tracks for external synths and drums are fully prepared for import in PT. audio files are bounced without EQ, and sidechaning. I think I'll stay in LP9 until it is supported, or there will be more reasonable evidence for using LPX.
  14. I've begun using LP9 as an only a creative tool. I've got all pro DAWs installed and may say that LP9 is the best. Nonetheless, I'm not going to advertise another DAW here but it is more professional and very stable for mixing purposes. I make my mixes in analogue environment and may say that LPX is fifth leg for my dog. 200 green for nothing. Oh, sorryI For a nice look and happy opportunity to quit using great 32-bit plugins. Hahahah I won't leave too much 32-bit stuff with perfect sound in favor of features that I don't need. Finally, If you are going to work with LP9 and LPX on the same system you may miss other opportunities. Sorry, Dave, for truth. I'm very disappointed by LPX.
  15. Thanks a lot! I appreciate your analysis very much. It is very helpful point of view. BTW that synth is Sylenth 2.2 by Lennard Digital. Other OTB is: Kick drum is Jomox MBase 11 2 x ORBAN 642B Parametric EQ (dual) 1 x Klark Technik DN410 dual parametric EQ (dual) 4 x Symetrix 501 PEAK-RMS compressor/limiter (modded) 2 x dbx 160 XT auto compressor (modded) 2 x Lexicon 300 Digital Effects System 1 x TC Electronic M3000 2 x Alesis Midiverb II (modded) Avid 192 Analog i/O & Avid 192 Digital I/O (32 channel output total ) SSL Alpha-X 24 DA converter
×
×
  • Create New...