lagerfeldt wrote:However, the actual physical components in an analog to digital converter cannot use such a high frequency rate without degrading the captured signal. So at 192 kHz the captured signal is a lot less than 24 bit resolution, but closer to a 16 bit signal.
ERO wrote:Great thread and very helpful chart. But what if your project is intended for CD?
Is the "cost" of sample rate conversion worth the additional quality of using a higher sample rate?
If yes, which one yields the cleanest down conversion to 44.1? What do you recommend in this case?
If you don't have RX or a similar offline SRC available, would that change your opinion on recording at a higher sample rate and then down converting?
David wrote:If Izotope RX is out of your budget, you can get the sample rate conversion for $60 by purchasing Triumph.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest