turbopump

I also have something to add: I managed to get what I wanted with the noise gate plugin, using as sidechain the audio to follow.

Hi. I have the same need. I half understand your reply but I sense it would do what I want! Could you please elaborate on “grab with two Auxes”? Thanks

Hello! I confess that I am not familiar with the several modes of Flex (time, pitch, etc) however I am puzzled because I feel that what I would like to achieve is so simple (in words) that it seems strange to me that there is not a simple way to do it. what would I like to do: take an audio file and say “dear Logic, I want this file stretched / squeezed by a factor of N”, where N is a natural number or a fraction 1/N. of course I would like a simple “natural” effect: the pitch must not be preserved but change in the same way that — say — a tape slowed down or accelerated would. i know that I can hold Option and drag an audio file and stretch it. The effect is just what I would like, but really I don’t want to do it graphically. I would really like to be able to work with simple numbers. Is there a way? thanks Marco

Hello! Firstly, thanks for the reply and for making me "know" Touch Tracks, that I totally ignored. I've had a look at them and, besides the "what the hell" comment that I can male (does not seem user friendly), it seems to me, at least from the bottom of the knowledge ladder where I stand, that is not the answer to my quest, if not because I wrote "a simpler way" in my request, in comparison with the Transposer. Anyway, I don't seem to find a way to use TT to limit the notes I can play bar by bar, given another MIDI track.

Hello everybody, I have been using from scratch Logic Pro for just over one year now, and... I wish I was a programmer of some sort because there is something I wish I could do with Logic, but I can't. I have really tried to look into the Environment, the various MIDI FX plugins but... Well, I did not find what I wanted and I hope you can help me out. Basically, I am looking for what I call an enhanced TRANSPOSER. What I would like to do is this: 1. In one track, I write a MIDI pattern, that in its simplest form could be just a series of chords, with the notes that have a ONE bar length. 2. In another track, the one that I am recording/playing live, I would like that while I hit the keys on the keyboard, Logic "transposes" my notes according to the ones that are in the first track: if the notes that I play in the 2nd track are included in the ones in the 1st track, well, they are played and recorded, otherwise they must be "transposed" to the one closest to it. I understand that I could achieve a similar result by using the TRANSPOSER MIDI FX and some automation... but really I would like a simpler way, like the one I described. Do you know a way to achieve this? Thanks, Marco

Actually I feel I am a little stupid. I mean... thinking again about it, probably what I want to do is simply done adding multiple plugins on the same track :-\ I apologise for the dumbness.

Hello! I use Logic since September, and that was my first DAW… there it is, my experience stated as plainly as possible! I would like to accomplish something that in my mind should be easy but… I can’t. Let’s say I have four tracks. The first track has a few midi notes and is a Monitor, or a Keyboard, in the environment. The second track receives via the Environment the notes in the first track; i choose a Sampler that plays these notes. The third track has just a delay plug-in so I get two notes playing instead of one—even if I mute the first track. (In the environment I simply route the second track to the third track, and it works). In the fourth track I add another delay, much longer, and via the Environment I route the third into the fourth. I would expect to hear four notes, but I don’t. I would hope and expect the fourth track receive the output of the third but instead it behaves as if the Monitor was directly plugged into it. How should I do it? Basically I would like to cascade the tracks so that the second works on the output of the first; the third works on the output of the second, etc. It should be possible… is it? Thanks!

Hi, Since I have the same problem and the solutions proposed did not work for me, but I found out what was the cause for me... here it is: I am using Google Drive (the latest version) on my M1 MacMini and I had just added the Alchemy folder to the Google Drive folders. It should have worked seamlessly but... I could not browse Alchemy settings any more. I eventually removed the folder from Google Drive sync, alas, and Alchemy resumed normal functioning.