You may have said it many times, Tigermaster, but you're misinformed.
You are correct, we're in the digital domain...but as an example, why are there "good" virtual mastering packages and "crappy" ones?
Because they look different? No.
I heard the argument once: "If you put a sine wave into Logic, and a sine wave into Cubase they will sound identical".
Well, yes...and when the music you make is comprised of a single sine wave then all the DAW's will sound exactly the same.
Just as Logic's compressor sounds different than Cubase's compressor, so too does each DAW have a different "Audio Engine",
and make different amounts of spacious-sounding headroom available.
Just off the top of my head I know for sure that Cubase sounds different from Logic.
And when I bothered to ask the developers of different DAW's they confirmed that.
ProTools applies slight multiband compression to the sum.
Cubase applies a LOAD of it, and you can hear the difference.
All of them do. It's known as their "Audio Engine".
So the same exact stems, placed into both programs will sound different at the master bus.
In the studio, I find that I need to notch out so many small frequencies when using Logic, sometimes I even need to
put two EQ's on the same channel because Logic doesn't soften as much of the midrange transients as Cubase does.
Using Cubase: MOST of the time the only EQ that's ever needed is taking the low bass freq's out.
It is obvious when you listen, that cubase definitely squashes the known "horror frequencies" such as any sudden transients in the 2k range.