But some cues i do might be in one tempo for one
Also I have an i9 maxxed out with ram mac book pro bit my sessions take 3 minutes to open because there’s so many sounds. Going between sessions would take forever. I get it for a movie, but not for a 13 minute episode with all sorts of complicated music.
But I’ve probably said all that before.
What I want to know is - if I can achieve it manually, but with trouble, why can’t it be programmed. I mean, if I can do it be stuffing around (and often screwing it up because I get confused and it disrupts my creative process), then why can’t the computer just do it? When I past in a SMPTE position to tell a tempo change to go back to its original position, it then automatically changes the previous tempo for me. As long as they are ON some kind of grid mark, which they need to be for recording sessions anyway, then it just calculates automatically what the previous buffer tempo needs to be in order to sync the new tempo mark. It might even be something like q=123.567 or whatever so that it syncs.
Also, when I use features like “cut/insert time” logic always asks me “do you want to insert a bar of 5/4 (for example) which helps keep things in sync, and that’s great. I’m essentially asking for the same thing, but instead with locked tempos.
Logic could just go “logic will insert a buffer tempo before your locked tempo mark, is this ok?”
And I would click yes. It would really just be what I already do manually with great difficulty, but it can just do it automatically, I would just sacrifice the preceding beat and it would calculate what it needs to be in order to stay in sync automatically.
I’m not a computer programmer, but I don’t see why that would be a problem, it would just have to keep doing that same calculation it already does every time I change a tempo.
Does that make sense?