Jump to content

des99

Moderator
  • Posts

    12,874
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    194

des99 last won the day on May 9

des99 had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

des99's Achievements

  1. That's not really "moving them in the mixer", it's more "finding a different way to adjust their sorting order in All mode in a limited and fairly painful and difficult way that's potentially quite disruptive to your project". ๐Ÿ˜‰ A new sort type of Custom, as I mentioned in the LP11 thread the other day, is probably the preferred solution to this, and you've outline this above.
  2. Indeed - as I've been saying, for me I'm way more interested in the final release notes, than the splashy marketing features... We don't know exactly why they went to 11 at this point, maybe it's just a continuation of Apple moving on from the 10/"X" branding they've had, by renaming Mac OSX to macOS, and also removing the "X" from Logic Pro X/Final Cut Pro X - Apple may just be moving on from that. And it doesn't seem that the version jump was, as speculated, a reason to force everyone to pay for a new major version, and/or change business models either (thankfully!) LP11 certainly doesn't look like the significant overhaul Logic had when it went from Logic Pro 9 to Logic Pro X / 10, so it will interesting to see what other changes we'll see in this version (and I'm sure whatever happens, there will be ample complaints of one sort or another... ๐Ÿ˜‰ )
  3. Instead of "picturing" it, actually perform the steps, one by one, as a recipe, on your copy of Logic. Then you can see and play with exactly what's done and what's happening, which is the best way of understanding it, imo. That's quite a complicated dynamic procedure to ask someone to create you an infographic for.
  4. No time is given, it will be up when it's up in the AppStore some time on that day (and it usually takes some hours to propagate around the other countries' AppStores too). In Europe, it's usually mid-day to late afternoon, generally (as the Americans get up so late on the East Coast... ๐Ÿ˜‰ )
  5. It takes longer to ship the bits all that way... ๐Ÿ˜‰
  6. You know that version of the press release is from Australia...? where timezones mean it's launching later... Edit: David won that race ๐Ÿ˜‰
  7. No problem! Just a pointer for people that might have missed it - there's some great freebies posted there, so the thread is worth a follow if you like plugins (and who doesn't..? ๐Ÿ™‚ )
  8. Yes, this was already recommended in the thread we have for posting free plugins, here:
  9. Record-enable both tracks with the software instruments on, and press record. Unless I'm misunderstanding you?
  10. PCM uncompressed data is what it is - there are a certain amount of samples/per second, which will result in the file size you get for the length of your project. If you want it to be smaller, you can cut out some bars or a section or so, or you can reduce the quality by bouncing 16-bit and/or with a lower sample rate. It seems somewhat arbitrary to define an uncompressed WAV bounce to a file size limit, but if you need to work to that, work out how much time it gives you, and constrain your music to that time span, unless you're happy with making the bounces lower quality. If you need more control over quality/versus file size and you'll need to move to compressed formats like mp3, and juggle the quality settings.
  11. If you're struggling with reading those details, other than changing your monitor settings (you might be running it very bright, for example, which isn't going to help) you may want to experiment with your Mac's accessibility settings - there are a bunch of things to change the contrast, brightness, text readability and so on, and you might find something there that works better for you, as some practical things you can do to improve the situation for you. (I have no problem reading the dark orange on the light grey background, there is plenty of contrast there for me on my monitors. They are certainly a long way from "unreadable" for me, but we all have different vision etc.)
  12. People have always been fearful and alarmist towards new technologies, particularly disruptive ones - for mostly understandable reasons. AI is just the latest one - will it reshape society? Probably yes, like many technologies before (eg, printing press, TV, computers, internet, mobile phones, social media etc). Will some people abuse it? Sure. Will some people embrace it and empower them to do creative things, and possibly more things than they could have previously? Sure. Much as it ever was. I don't really share the "this new technology <insert fears of the current moment here> is going to be the death of XXX"... attitude generally, but it's always good to be wary, and understand the implications of new technologies, and hopefully deploy and use them wisely (as much as humans can, of course...), and monitor our progress as we go in case we don't like the direction and course correct. There's already plenty of bad music out there - if you worry about people who don't learn to play instruments or how music works, then the bad news is computers and software and accessible technologies let these people make music decades ago. (I'd argue that that's no bad thing, personally, I was no more a good musician when I first unwrapped my Casio VL-Tone than anyone else loading Garageband for the first time, but of course it does mean that the more people who *can* make art, means that there's more low-quality art out there, while some of these people will develop into good artists over time.) That doesn't change the fact that there are still great musicians, making great music, and it's good to focus on the music you like, rather than the stuff that you don't. Being creative is a human thing, and regardless of what else is going on, I don't see any historical evidence that past technological progress has changed human nature, nor do I expect this latest one to do so. And is it hard to making a living from creative work? Yes. It always has been. Having an extra virtual bassist window in Logic isn't really going to change my musical output, and while I'll play with it for sure, based on how Drummer works I can pretty much guess what it's going to be like, and for me, it's likely not going to replace me putting my own bass lines down. It's probably a fun thing that can come in handy sometimes, and maybe for some people it'll be a godsend (like Drummer was, a lot of people just seem to not be able to do drums at all, or even be interested in it) but I suspect largely for me, like the Score Editor, or other tools I don't use, that window will mostly stay closed. However, I *am* interested in the changes that the release notes may reveal, and those are more important to me. ๐Ÿ‘
  13. No, there is no current easy way to do this I believe. I don't think you can do it via LUA either, as when I looked into it, scripts here only let you create a limited set of assignments into the top "no zone" layer only, so that limits what you can do unless your requirements are really basic. (However, I've not looked into the LUA stuff in depth, and it's not documented, so I'm not fully aware of the extent of what's possible here.) A little while back I spent some time reversing the controller assignments file format to let be able to do things like this, including batch updates to broken assignments* (which I use when Logic breaks my assignments), import/export of all assignments for a particular control surface and so on, because I also have use cases for these things - it's not often straightforward to just replace the current CS with a backup if you've in the meantime added a new controller or something. These are all things that are earmarked to be rolled into my lrep app at some point, alongside other useful little Logic-related things like this. But in the meantime, you'll have to make do. (Before I could fix the CS prefs directly, I used to use Keyboard Maestro to go through and make bulk changes - faster than doing it manually, but this is a lot slower than directly editing the file with a lot of changes.)
  14. I think it was the three-finger scroll thing that can control the faders...
  15. Doesn't work for me either, but I never use it that so wouldn't notice. I prefer to grab physical controls for the most part, but don't mind the odd bit of mouse tweaking where necessary. I remember you can get macOS trackpad preferences to let you drag faders, so it's possible some macOS mouse settings perhaps enable this feature.
×
×
  • Create New...