Jump to content

hepski

Member
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

hepski's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare

Recent Badges

2

Reputation

  1. That got it! Thanks for the help. My autopunch was set to start after the main recording before comping. Apparently that was the issue.
  2. Hello, I have two individual tracks recorded at the same time for a stereo guitar. One is named "bridge" and the other is named "neck". Im trying to comp them together. I have them assigned to a group and editing is enabled. However, they are not in sync when editing. They are both selected and when I comp "Bridge" it works but "neck" does not respond. Any insight as to why this is? Thanks in advance. Tom
  3. Thanks Steve. Makes sense, but one issue is I'll have to do the same thing 2 times for each track. Also they'll won't be identical anymore as I'll never be able to do fine edits the same on both. I suppose that would work well if I just used the macro. Unless I'm misunderstanding something. I saw an old tutorial by melodyne that suggested the aux concept for stereo recording, but it was in pro tools as I recall. Plus there have been so many updates since then.
  4. Hello Folks, I have an acoustic guitar that has mic on the neck (track 1) and one on the bridge (track 2) recorded simultaneously. I'm sending them both to stereo Aux 5 where I'm adding Melodyne via transfer as opposed to ARA. I then want to eq those tracks individually so I'm sending them to 2 separate aux tracks (aux 6, aux7) but I'm basically getting the 2 tracks sub mixed on both aux6 and aux7. Make sense? I'd like to be able to work with each track individually, post melodyne. Any suggestions? thanks.
  5. Another option might be to have the origunal one track locked down and unchanged in a track stack. Then duplicate it and use the second copy as my live edit. If I need a reset, I can go back and duplicate again.
  6. That's a good call scg. I'll give that a shot.
  7. Hello, I was not able to turn this up in a search exactly. I have my drummer converted to midi and I want to "humanize" it so it doesn't sound as robotic. As is often the case, I push the humanize a bit too far before wanting to pull it back a bit after auditioning the results. Undos are fine for this. However, I may log out for a while to give me ears a rest and come back to find that I'd like to reset the humanize all together and start again. I don't find where I can reset this anywhere. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Tom
  8. I did a search, but don't see that folks are having issues with the following method to transpose. I'm using logic 10.6.1 on Catalina. I have a song that I've recorded and am adding vocals. It's just a snippet out of my range so I'd like to transpose it down a 1/2 step. I know I can go to each track and lower transpose to -1 and that does work, but I was under the impression that the Global Transpose could do it for every track. For some reason this has no effect. Am I missing a step?Thanks in advance. See screen shot.
  9. Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated. It appears a little more homework is in order.
  10. A couple of reasons, I've got plenty of hard drive space and a new computer UA Arrow has a Thunderbolt 3 connection I like to keep things at their highest quality if it doesn't compromise the recording process Having worked with various formats and digital media over the years (not just audio) the best quality of today seems to quickly become the average quality. I know there are different perspectives of what the human ear can hear. This is my personal preference.
  11. So I just bought a UA Arrow. I have a project that was SUPPOSED to have been recorded at 192 kHz, but I found out yesterday it was recorded at only 96 kHz. This project has all of the instruments and is mixed. My workflow is to finish the music and then bring that stereo track into a new project to finish the vocals. My question is, would in be acceptable to convert that stereo track, which was recorded at 96kHz, to 192kHz so I can record my vocals at 192kHz or should I just keep everything including the yet to be recorded vocals at 96kHz? I'm not sure how what the conversion will introduce as it obviously has to extrapolate data. Thanks in advance.
  12. Thanks Triplets, I was thinking about that appogee element 24 or the UA Arrow. Any particular preference on those? Style of music is pop rock (REM, Beatles, etc).
  13. Hello, I have a Steinberg UR22 audio interface that I've had for 3 years and it has been discontinued. It's USB2 and will convert as high as 24-bit/192 kHz. This is what I record at. I've just bought a Mac Mini with 6 core I7 which also includes thunderbolt 3 ports and 2 USB ports. My question is will the UR22 (going through the USB) still competently do the job or is it worth upgrading to something with the same or slightly higher price range (200-300). My setup: Tube Condenser mic > Universal Audio Tube Pre > Steinberg UR22 > Logic Pro I'm kind of a 1 man band so I only ever record 2 tracks at a time max. For example an acoustic guitar with 2 mics for stereo. Thanks in advance for any feedback.
  14. No worries David. It was very intuitive once they were grouped. This video helped a bit as well: Thanks, Tom
×
×
  • Create New...