jimdilian Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 will be very nice if Logic Pro X someday could allow users to record sometracks in 96 khz and the rest of the project in 48 khz for vocals will be very nice.. and for future re-works and masters.. etc.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triplets Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 Why would you wanna do that? More reasons for problems and crashes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djsnake Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 I heard Sample Rate divided by two = how much frequencies are going to be (like 44.1 = 22,050 Frequencies) Since human ear can't hear above 20Khz, what's the point of working with higher Sample Rates? Are there any benefits of it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakobP Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 (edited) Yes, if you're into recording dog whistles and bats. Edited April 12, 2021 by JakobP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djsnake Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 What do you mean? If humans can barely hear above 20kHz, there should be no point of above 44.1kHz if there isn't anything related to Sample Rate? Is there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakobP Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 In my opinion there's no point, but some people insists on otherwise... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Nahmani Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 Even if you are convinced that 96k is better than 48k, I strongly doubt that sampler rate is anywhere close to being the weak link in your audio production chain. The only reason for DAW and audio interface manufacturers to spend time designing software and hardware that support sample rates higher than 48kHz is to cater to the general public who has been tricked into thinking that higher is better. Meanwhile, most professionals continue to produce 98% of the commercially distributed music we consume at 44.1k or 48k. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimdilian Posted April 13, 2021 Author Share Posted April 13, 2021 96k is perfect.. to me.. even if you don't hear it.. you can defiTly hear it ¡ HAHA.. really the only times i record my voice.. and put play.. and hear the same.. is at 88.2 or 96 .. 48 not enough .. but yea WHY ?.. mix 2 sample rates.. well.. for the vocals.. specially.. and to save CPU.. je.. I hear another DAW that could do that.. and I though why not logic?.. if it is possible why not?.. nothing like 88.2 or 96 khz.. at 24 bits sounds.,.. like reality .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimdilian Posted April 13, 2021 Author Share Posted April 13, 2021 and besides.. after 20 years using computers we should be all now at.. 96 khz as the Standard.. in 2021.. but we still use.. 48.. very slow progress in audio.. many cores etc.. but the same tech.. as 25 years ago... no break through in that regard.. latency etc.. buffer.. etc..QUALITY¡ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookatthisguy Posted April 13, 2021 Share Posted April 13, 2021 and besides.. after 20 years using computers we should be all now at.. 96 khz as the Standard.. in 2021.. but we still use.. 48.. very slow progress in audio.. many cores etc.. but the same tech.. as 25 years ago... no break through in that regard.. latency etc.. buffer.. etc..QUALITY¡ Moore's Law has nothing to do with the hearing abilities of humans, as it seems you're saying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.