ew1 Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 (edited) I heard an engineer say that if you want to EQ the side channel of a sound, don't use a minimum phase EQ. Only do it with linear phase. He didn't explain why though. Why is this? Edited November 14, 2019 by ew1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzfilth Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 Well, best way to find out is to try it. Set up two tracks with the same complex mix, do identical side EQs with Logic's normal EQ on one, Logic's Linear EQ on the other and compare. Report back your findings and post the reason to your statement in the topic title. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eriksimon Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 The way it is now phrased I was expecting an explanation. But the actual topic should have been: "Why shouldn't you do side EQ with minimum phase?" My guess is that with minimum phase you get phasing, albeit minimally. But that is just guessing. I don't think I have used side EQing yet. I am so ashamed. But at least now I know that "an" engineer has said to use linear phase EQ for that. Who am I to not listen to "an" engineer? So in my next project I am going to use linear phase side EQ-ing, regardless of whether that is needed or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ploki Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 Isn't the side channel what's generally un-corellated to the Mid channel? As in, Side channel is everything that's not in the Mid channel. In any case, i don't really mind, and i generally dislike the sound of Linear Phase EQs so I did indeed use minimal phase mid/side-EQ before, and will in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ew1 Posted November 14, 2019 Author Share Posted November 14, 2019 Thanks for the replies everybody. To be honest, I'm finding it hard to hear the difference but I'll keep experimenting anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon.a.billington Posted November 15, 2019 Share Posted November 15, 2019 There are a few eqs that do mid-side, but aren’t linear phase. So I’d say that suggests something to. It’s not always necessary, but any variations to phase might not necessarily be a bad thing, it couldn’t even help to separate mid from side in a pleasant way. Not all phase change is a bad thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ploki Posted November 15, 2019 Share Posted November 15, 2019 There are a few eqs that do mid-side, but aren’t linear phase. So I’d say that suggests something to. FabFilter ProQ, Voxengo every EQ since ever, Logic's Channel EQ, Logic's Vintage EQs, and just about every hardware midside EQ in existence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon.a.billington Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 There are a few eqs that do mid-side, but aren’t linear phase. So I’d say that suggests something to. FabFilter ProQ, Voxengo every EQ since ever, Logic's Channel EQ, Logic's Vintage EQs, and just about every hardware mid0side EQ in existence. bx_digital, H-EQ, Scheps Omni EQ, Elysia museq... So, yes... Mid-Side can be done with minimal phase eq. Is long as it's an improvement to the overall sound, what does it matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ploki Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 FabFilter ProQ, Voxengo every EQ since ever, Logic's Channel EQ, Logic's Vintage EQs, and just about every hardware mid0side EQ in existence. bx_digital, H-EQ, Scheps Omni EQ, Elysia museq... So, yes... Mid-Side can be done with minimal phase eq. Is long as it's an improvement to the overall sound, what does it matter. I think fiddling with m/s alone if you don't know what you're doing is more dangerous. I couldn't produce test that would result in worse mono compatibility because no-latency EQ was in place of linear phase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon.a.billington Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 bx_digital, H-EQ, Scheps Omni EQ, Elysia museq... So, yes... Mid-Side can be done with minimal phase eq. Is long as it's an improvement to the overall sound, what does it matter. I think fiddling with m/s alone if you don't know what you're doing is more dangerous. I couldn't produce test that would result in worse mono compatibility because no-latency EQ was in place of linear phase. That's quite a valid point. I think it comes back down to bypassing it and comparing it with the original and asking yourself if it's an improvement. Do it again in mono and if you're doing more harm than good then change it, or drop it completely. I tend to begin with regular stereo eq with both sides linked, then when it's close and it's helping, not hurting, I will unlink the sides and drop it into mid-side mode and make some tweaks from there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holger Lagerfeldt Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Isn't the side channel what's generally un-corellated to the Mid channel?As in, Side channel is everything that's not in the Mid channel. In any case, i don't really mind, and i generally dislike the sound of Linear Phase EQs so I did indeed use minimal phase mid/side-EQ before, and will in the future. Exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.