Jump to content

sytrusze

Member
  • Posts

    225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

sytrusze's Achievements

  1. Does it work now? Yes I have, but in my experience it ruins the vocal frequencies when there is a little bit more noise going on. This plugin from UAD seems to handle it really well, without any artifacts. Haven't tested it tho, so it might be a good marketing technique..
  2. This plugin seems amazing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxJrOqCKqlU&ab_channel=UniversalAudio However, most of us don't want to invest in a trillion dollar UAD hardware setup to use their plugins. Any alternatives to this plugin? I love the simplicity that it only has 2 knobs and they get the job done. I've tried the NS1 by Waves but it doesn't fully remove the noise is my experience.
  3. Preach brother! Same thing here, hence why I started this topic. I kinda figured out a way in FL studio, it's a bit of a different workflow I have to get adjusted to but for Logic I still haven't found a solid solution. Fingers crossed for the future
  4. Unfortunately, no. I swindle between FL studio and Logic but as of right now, both Logic and FL haven't added this feature (yet). I've talked to an engineer from Image-line. What he told me was: "The idea is fairly simple, but the coding behind it is a lot more complicated." I can't speak on that part, but I am still forced to bounce all my stems manually. It is what it is I'm afraid..
  5. Re-opening this thread: Does anyone know a 3rd party VST that simulates this? Mainly because I'd love to have a similar feature in other DAW's as well.
  6. I've actually been getting into Ableton Live, so who knows. I just love Logic too much
  7. It's simple buddy. They purchase the beat/production including the stems/individual tracks -> they import the stems/individual tracks -> record vocals to it -> take out / add in instruments, re-arrange it to their likings -> do slight mixing where needed -> send to master -> put out the song. The goal is: I compose the production, the artist that purchases it and can do whatever they like to do with it. And hopefully, that artist places a major hit song of course That's all. I feel blessed, thanks everyone for their input!
  8. Firstyl: Like I mentioned earlier, these aren't pro's. These are indie home studio upcoming artist Secondly: They don't need to mix it down further and my stems don't include vocals just instruments. They want control over the arrangement (individual tracks). Isn't that the whole point of this thread? I DO want to send 2 versions. 1 with and 1 without FX (dry and wet). I can batch export the dry, but not the wet. Most definitely agree with you on that. But like I said, the individual tracks are being used to control the arrangement not mix. For the people that do want to control the mix, they can use the dry versions. Hope that makes sense.
  9. I've been doing it like this for 10 years now, but thank you kindly for your advice Hence this topic, hoping there was a batch option for this. I strongly disagree. Online producing changed the whole game, every "urban" producer needs this function in their live. All good man, thank you for trying to help out!
  10. Nice wordplay there Okay back to seriousness. Thanks for understanding first of all, I think it might be a genre-difference indeed why you've never experienced any requests like this. It depends on the recipient, but mostly they like the have control of the arrangement. Leave certain instruments out or re-arrange on certain parts of the song, to match their vocals or lyrics is what most recipients purchase the individual tracks for. It gives them full control of the production, without compromising in terms of the original mix. Of course, like you said things like compression I always leave out when I bounce the individual tracks (unless I am also sending stems, complete drum bus for example but that's different). So bottom line is: it doesn't even matter what they do with it. They just need the individual tracks to be as close as the original mix, so they have to do less work as possible. I understand that back in the day this was different. Raw stems were sent out and a professional engineer did the mixing. But that's not how it works in 2021 anymore. The internet changed everything. Indie (home-studio) artist from all over the world with little to no mixing knowledge also purchase the individual tracks from me. They don't have an engineer that will make sure the final mix gets as close to the original. All they want is the individual tracks to be as close as identical to the orignal mix, that's all.
  11. Clear on the stems clarification. Let's call it individual tracks from now on because that's what I was referring to. Of course, this goes for let's say compression etc. but not for reverb, automated (low-pass) filters that you applied etc. Maybe not for some, for me it's mandatory! I've been making music as a living for the past 10 years, with over 1000 clients that all asked for the stems (or individual tracks I should say). They don't want dry individual tracks, they want the effects to be printed on them. Sure, some want both dry AND wet but never only the dry versions. They want the individual tracks to sound identical to the mix that I did, or at least as close as possible so they can change the arrangement where needed in their own DAW. Let me give you a simplified example: I often use a low pass filter on the master channel that I automate for certain parts, e.g. a build-up. This affects all tracks obviously. Do you really want to send the individual tracks without the low pass filter and have the artist or their engineer spend hours on trying to replicate your automation effects? No, I would like to believe not. A low-pass filter is fairly easy to replicate, yes, but what about glitch/stutter effects on the master? There is no way they can exactly replicate that and you don't even WANT to them to. The individual tracks have to be as close to your mix as possible when being sent out, period. Hard to believe I am the only person facing this issue
  12. Damn. How do you guys do this then? I have about 200 projects with over 40 tracks per project, all using sends/busses. Now, my clients want the stems (with the bus/send effects printed of course). So you are telling me that the only way for me to get this done is by solo-ing each individual track and bounce it 1 by 1? Can you imagine how time consuming this will be to do it manually
  13. Hey guys, How can I export the individual tracks with the bus/send effects printed on them without having to export all tracks manually 1 by 1 (solo-ing each track)? This is an example: I have this snare receiving reverb from the Aux channel. Now when I bounce "All tracks as audio files" it bounces the snare without the reverb. Thank you!
  14. Seems that deleting the MSB data did the trick...thanks dess99!
  15. Thanks Des99, but where do find this MIDI data? I know nothing about Logic and it's MIDI files data so I'm completely new to this.
×
×
  • Create New...