Sure, but what facts or specs? Nothing has been discussed here besides the fact that successive Pro processors seem to be weighting toward more efficiency cores and fewer performance cores. I haven't delved much into what I saw on those videos, where the efficiency cores were simply not being used by Logic, but coming from an 8-core Intel, I wouldn't want to see those cores at 0%.
More anecdotes here, but my degree is in screen scoring, and several of my classmates and professors came to me to discuss their Mac Studio purchases (because until my career takes off (fingers crossed), my day job is selling Macs), and none of them went for less than 64 GB. The ones that did only did so because that's what they could afford at the time. I simply don't agree that "64 -96g ram should be more than enough for anything on a modern mac"— in most cases, yes, absolutely. But for the type of work we're doing, I'd rather not concern myself with concerns of a potential bottleneck down the road.
Of course, one could argue that by the time you're maxing out that computer, you ought to be flush enough with work to be able to afford buying a new one. It's a nice thought… not inherently as true as it may have once been, but I digress. I would definitely agree that unless OP is (already) an orchestral mockup wunderkind, this build is likely to run fantastically for a long time to come.